Categories
Armed Conflict

Lake Chad Crisis: Is ISWAP’s Presence Being Accepted As a Fact of Life?

From what has been observed about the Lake Chad crisis, so far, it seems that the Nigerian government’s priorities have shifted away from addressing the threat posed by ISWAP.

In 2015, a presidential candidate (Muhammadu Buhari) won the election by promising to “destroy” Boko Haram; however, during the most recent election, ISWAP, an evolution of the Boko Haram, was barely mentioned.

Does this suggests that the group’s presence has been accepted as a fact of life, allowing it to govern according to its interpretation of Shari’a law and collect taxes from the population?

While the Nigerian military’s “super camps” strategy has secured cities and towns, ISWAP retains control over the countryside, leading to a deepened humanitarian crisis and ongoing conflict.

However, this situation has also led to a humanitarian crisis in the region, with millions of people displaced and an ongoing conflict that has claimed thousands of lives. It is worrying that the Nigerian government appears to have accepted ISWAP’s presence as a fact of life rather than actively seeking to eliminate the group and restore peace to the region.

It is important to note that accepting the presence of a terrorist group as a fact of life is not a viable long-term solution. While it may bring a temporary sense of stability, it allows the group to continue to operate and potentially grow in strength, posing a continued threat to both the local population and the wider region.

It was sad that none of the presidential candidates in the last general election made any direct mention of the group nor the strategy they’d deploy to tackle them as they did of Boko Haram in 2015.

The Nigerian government must find a way to address the root causes of the conflict and work towards a lasting peace rather than implicitly tolerating ISWAP’s presence.

Categories
Politics

Top Nigerian Lawyer Criticizes Chimamanda Adichie’s Election Stance

Top Nigerian lawyer and professor Yemi Oke wrote an open letter to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and US President Joe Biden regarding the Nigerian elections.

In the letter, dated Sunday April 9th, Oke criticized popular Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Adichie’s stance on the February 25th presidential polls.

Oke referred to Adichie’s letter to Biden as “seditious” and accused her of engaging in extraterritorial ethnocentric politicking as a non-resident Nigerian-American.

Oke went on to state that Adichie’s letter was unbecoming and that she had written a seditious letter against the government and people of Nigeria, falling short of expectations.

Oke expressed his surprise that a privileged Nigerian-born writer like Adichie would choose to portray her country of origin in such a negative light.

“Chimamanda’s letter was against entire Nigeria’s Democracy that was fought and procured with patriotic bloods and undeterred resolve of democrats, chief among them being Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” he said.

Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Adichie wrote an open letter to US President Joe Biden accusing Nigeria’s electoral commission of ignoring “glaring red flags” and manipulating the presidential election.

Adichie supported the Labour Party candidate, Peter Obi, and claimed that if the results had been uploaded in real-time, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Tinubu, would not have won.

The APC candidate was declared the winner, with 8,794,726 votes, beating his closest challenger, Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party, who scored 6,984,520 votes. Peter Obi came third with 6,101,533 votes.

In response, Nigerian lawyer and professor Yemi Oke wrote an open letter to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Biden, criticising Adichie’s letter as “seditious.”

Oke accused Adichie of engaging in “extraterritorial ethnocentric politicking” as a non-resident Nigerian-American.

Categories
Features Politics

Mamman Daura and the Next President of Nigeria

By Wale Adebanwi

Whoever wins the February 2023 presidential election in Nigeria would have done so chiefly because of, or, in spite of, Mamman Daura, the 83-year-old senescent nephew of President Mohammadu Buhari. This might seem an ostentatious claim or an inflationary attribution of power to a man whose only claim to it, in the present circumstances, is that the president is his younger nephew. Yet, this is an open secret among those with a deep knowledge of the current struggle for the presidency and the nature of power under the Muhammadu Buhari administration. But most people are not eager to discuss the matter directly in public, either because of discretion and/or fear of the ‘almighty’ Daura.

However, between the candidate of the ruling party, Governor Bola Tinubu, and the candidate of the main opposition party, Vice President Atiku Abubakar, there is a clear recognition of the central role that Daura is playing and would play regarding who becomes the next president of Nigeria. For the former Lagos Governor, this could not have come as a surprise. He recognizes that the presidency, which has been, for the most part of the last eight years, effectively under the control of Daura, is being mobilized one way or the other against him. Perhaps more than any other person, it is Daura who has ensured that Tinubu would not reap, as ‘designed,’ the full benefits of his total investment in making Buhari president.

When Buhari declared upon acceding to power that he “belonged to nobody,” it was in part a ventriloquist shot from his nephew in the direction of the man who had assumed that he would be the power behind the throne. At the centre of the process that eventuated in the much analyzed “outburst” of the Jagaban at Abeokuta, when he let it be known to the world that “emi lo kan” (“it is my turn”; or “I am next”) was Daura’s machinations to ensure that Tinubu would not be the presidential candidate of the ruling party, let alone succeed Buhari.

Those who thought that the outburst sealed Tinubu’s fate were to realize later that the man has not governed Nigeria’s most important state either directly or by proxy for 22 years for nothing. By taking the battle to Buhari and his handlers, the Abeokuta wager turned out to be a courageous venture that helped to stop Daura and his constituents in their tracks – and thus, made a mockery of their desperate bid to hand over the party’s ticket to the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan. If Tinubu’s spirited survival of the President Olusegun Obasanjo-led “tsunami” that swept all the other AD governors out of power in 2003 did not convince most people about the man’s political genius, how he retrieved every single South-western states in installments from the opposition and ended up installing Buhari as president in concert with other forces, should have confirmed his unusual political potency. No doubt, that potency was at its most vulnerable when he formally joined the bid to win the APC ticket – and remains so now that he goes for the ultimate prize. Yet, it was also the point at which all of his accumulated political assets had to be mobilized in the service of his life-long ambition.

However, it must be noted that it was not until Tinubu encountered Daura that he experienced his first major sustained checkmate in the politics of the Fourth Republic. The man who has since become the most valuable player in Yoruba politics was dealing with an unusual adversary in Daura. None of those that Tinubu had had to wrestle with since 1998 – that is, when he started his campaign to be the governor of Lagos State – possessed the strategic advantage of a combination of stealth, reticence and unaccountable power as Daura does.

Cerebral, generous but taciturn, Mamman Daura, the fascinating power-monger par excellence, and the former newspaper editor and manager seems resolved to terminate Tinubu’s political ambition on the eve of the latter’s ultimate home run.

As the only surviving member of the triumvirate that can lay claim to almost unbridled influence over Muhammadu Buhari, Daura is well-placed to either hinder or advance the ambition of the two leading presidential contenders, Bola Tinubu and Atiku Abubakar in the February 2023 presidential election. And he is not shy to use his leverage in tipping the scale against the former Lagos governor.

With the passing of the two other closest people to Buhari, that is, the late Emir of Borgu, Haliru Dantoro Kitoro III, who died in October 2015, barely five months after Buhari came to office, and Liman Ciroma, Nigeria’s first qualified archaeologist (who the Guardian of London described in an obituary in 2014 as a “a fine public servant” who was ‘courteous, considerate and generous”), the Daura-born presidential nephew has had no counter weight since 2015. Had he lived well past 2015, the late Emir, who was singularly responsible for brokering the rapprochement that made the “political marriage” of Buhari (CPC) and Tinubu (ACN) possible, would not have allowed the deliberate distancing between the two that followed Buhari’s ascendancy to power.

The first lady, Aisha Halilu Buhari, could not replace the late Borgu monarch. Her intrepid effort to stand up to Daura ended in semi-exile in Dubai, as her husband declared that her place was in the “other room.” But the resolute woman is back with vengeance. Now, as we move towards February 25, she wants to ensure that Daura’s reign would end with that of his kin.

It was as if fate was conspiring against Tinubu and Nigeria in the passing of the Emir of Borgu and Ciroma. Not a few around Buhari believe that his administration would not have come to this sorry pass if the two had lived longer. At least, Daura would not have had a debilitating unchecked leverage over Buhari in the last eight years, which most people believe to be a tragedy for Nigeria. These two late gentlemen, not having to be around the Villa like Daura, would have provided some other avenues of reaching Buhari in moderating the excesses of those who have determined the terrible trajectory of his headship of the Nigerian state. But those who know Daura well still wonder how such an otherwise fine mind and quiet soul had turned into one of the most consequential and hindering power mongers in Nigeria’s history.

Those in this category even insist that Daura’s influence on Buhari and his leverage in this government have been overstated. They would add that if the country were to have been differently organized, the suave, lettered and cultivated man would have been the president and his not similarly lettered uncle would have been his aide.

But the reality of Daura’s influence and imprint on the most devastating actions and inaction of this administration are too glaring. Take the way he has preserved and protected the tragedy that answers to the tag of the Governor of the Central Bank, Godwin Emefiele – even encouraging, as many believed, the latter to run for the presidency, and keeping Emefiele in office after that abortive ambition. How could such a man who clearly had a conflict of interest be allowed to not only continue in office, but claim to be changing the colour of the currency in order to affect the outcome of the presidential election? Imagine the untold suffering of the poor masses of the country that this ill-considered measure has caused.

Whatever you think of the leading contenders for the presidency, his adversaries would insist, there are fewer stronger examples of Daura’s gamble with the fate of the nation and of democracy than the recent moves by edgy fifth columnists of all stripes.

For those still wondering what happened to the candidness of ‘Candido,’ the famed masked newspaper columnist of the defunct New Nigerian: it is power. This is what power does to human beings, especially when they assume that they have Power with a capital “P” – though all that any of us can have, even in the best of circumstances, is only power with a small “p.” No one can have Power. It eludes even the most deranged among us throughout human history. Yet, that does not stop some people from attempt to play God.

Will Daura’s role as the “unseen god of the Aso Rock Villa” in the last eight years be confirmed or repudiated in the next presidential election? We have only a few weeks to find out. But whatever happens, Daura would no doubt have done his best to determine who would (not) be our next president.

*Adebanwi, author of Yoruba Elites and Ethnic Politics in Nigeria, is the Presidential Penn Compact Professor of Africana Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Categories
Politics Press Release

2023: Sultan of Sokoto Breaks Silence on Peter Obi Endorsement, Lambasts ‘Obidients’

The Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, has described as irresponsible the attempt by the campaign of the Labour Party’s Presidential candidate Peter Obi to drag him into the murky water of the 2023 election.

The foremost Islamic religious leader was quoted in a doctored document saying he should be held responsible if Peter Obi didn’t perform well as President of Nigeria. A statement which ostensibly infers that he has endorsed Mr Obi’s presidential ambition.

The purported message went wild in circulation even though many Nigerians who knew the Islamic leader and statesman discountenanced it.

The issue is just a confirmation of the volume of fake news that has shrouded the information space from where Nigerians are supposed to make informed decisions on their right candidate.

Reacting to the sad development, the media team stated to absolve the monarch even as they did not hide their anger toward the Obidients for falsely attributing such uncanny information to His Royal Majesty, the Sultan.

The response reads:

IGNORE IRRESPONSIBLE ATTEMPT TO DRAG SULTAN INTO POLITICS of 2023 BY PETER OBI CAMPAIGNERS

The attention of Media Team of Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, CFR, mni, has been drawn to a statement circulating on social media titled, “BREAKING: SULTAN OF SOKOTO WRITES” with an opening credited to Sultan purportedly saying, “Hold me responsible if Peter Obi didn’t perform well, the problem of the North is from the north, not Peter Obi or an Igbo man, it will be worst and more deadly for the North if Tinubu wins, if they tell you an Igbo man is the problem of Nigeria, tell them Igbo man never rule Nigeria before and north is world poverty capital”.

Ordinarily the statement should not be dignified with a pinch of reaction but because of the need to put the record straight for the sake of truth seeking Nigerians. Recall that this is not the first time such misleading statement would be circulated in effort to climb on the influential personality and name of the Sultan to score political goals. Unfortunately for the these pitiable political campaigners, Sultan of Sokoto is – strictly speaking – a traditional ruler and leader of Muslims of Africa’s most populous country. Moreso, as a retired Army General, his discipline, commitment and unalloyed to Nigeria is non-nogotiable.

For the avoidance of doubt, the statement is fake because such an irresponsible write-up, credited to him, could not have emanated from anywhere near or around His Eminence Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, CFR, mni, the Sultan of Sokoto and President General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA).

Between Wednesday and Thursday, the Sultan played host to several figures including the outgoing and new General Officers Commanding (GOCs), Eighth Division Nigerian Army, Sokoto, Major Generals O. Bassey and Godwin Mutkut, respectively, Vice Presidential Candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator Kashim Shettima, among others.

It would interest Nigerians to know that Presidential Candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Dr. Peter Obi, was not one of those that paid visit to the palace, be it on Wednesday or Thursday. So, how some agents of discord whose stock-in-trade is to thrive on cooking falsehoods and peddling of Fame news think that they can get through with this remains unknown to common sense.

The simple challenge is to ask them to publish a copy of the letter purportedly written by the Sultan or a video or audio clip where he endorsed Peter Obi and denied APC Presidential Candidate Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as contained in their peddled fakeness. If they cannot, and of a surety they cannot, they should desist from this indefensible claim and unpardonable lie using the good bane of his His Eminence because it will backfire.

It should, however, be made clear to the good people of Nigeria that this , like many others in the past by the Peter Obi campaigners, would not stop the Sultan from continuing to play his role as a multifaceted leader and father of all and so, his doors will remain open to all aspirants across all parties and other meaningful people from across the country.

More important to Sultan Sa’ad Abubakar at this time and always are security, peace and unity of Nigeria, especially as the nation is fast moving into its long planned and heavily invested general elections. He will continue to support all efforts that will lead to success of the election process. So, let any incoherent claims of naysayers be ignored. Sultan is not a politician.

PRINCE BASHIR ADEFAKA,
For: Media Team of the Sultan of Sokoto

Thursday January 19, 2023.

Categories
News Politics

2023: Nigerian Judge Discards Lawyer’s Suite Challenging Muslim-Muslim Ticket

A Nigerian Judge, Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed, of the Federal High Court in Abuja, the nation’s capital, had on Wednesday, Jan.18, 2023, thrown out a suit by a rights lawyer seeking disqualification of the presidential candidate of the country’s ruling party, All Progressives Congress (APC) Bola Ahmed Tinubu over his choice of selecting a fellow Muslim as his running mate.

An Abuja-based legal practitioner, Osigwe Momoh, had his suit thrown out by the Judge on the grounds that it lacked locus standi.

Justice Mohammed maintained that the lawyer who is not a member of APC “and having not participated in the process that produced Tinubu and his running mate, Kashim Shetima, cannot query them on the nominations.”

The legal practitioner had in the suit wanted the court to issue an order “nullifying” the candidature of APC and Tinubu from participating in the presidential election on the ground that “the nomination of Muslim-Muslim candidacy is unconstitutional and against the spirit and letters of sections 14, 15 and 224 of the 1999 Constitution.”

Barrister Momoh had argued that “the Muslim-Muslim candidacy runs counter to the spirit of national cohesion, integration and unity.”

He requested the court for “an order of perpetual injunction to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from publishing the name of APC and its presidential candidate for the 2023 election.”

However, Justice Mohammed differed from the plaintiff on the legal right to initiate the case in the first place and subsequently threw it out in totality.

Justice Mohammed upheld the preliminary objection of APC and Tinubu and did not award any cost against the plaintiff.

This story is relevant to Bay-6 News because Kashim Shettima, the chosen running mate of Mr Tinubu and the Presidential candidate of the opposition People Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, are both from the northeast states of Borno and Adamawa. Bay-6 News covers the six states of the Northeast as the first catchment area before other parts of Nigeria and beyond.

Kindly like and share this story using the handles below👇

Categories
Politics

INTERVENTION: Fraudulent analogy of ‘Naka Sai Naka’

By Mahmud Jega

The political “analogy” widely circulated on the social media in recent days by the Kaduna State Chapter of Naka Sai Naka [roughly translated as Only Yours] campaign, that the 2023 election in Nigeria is going to be analogous to the 1979 presidential election, deserves closer scrutiny.

The group claims that “Peter Obi/Labour Party is analogous to Azikiwe/NPP [of the Second Republic]. That Tinubu/APC is analogous to Awolowo/UPN. That Atiku/PDP is analogous to Shagari/NPN, and that Kwankwaso/NNPP is analogous to Aminu Kano/PRP.”

It then added:

“1. Aminu Kano was from Kano and won only in Kano State. (Kwankwaso will do the same).

  1. Obafemi Awolowo was from the South West and won the region. (Tinubu will do the same).
  2. Azikiwe won his zone, South East (Peter Obi will do the same).
  3. Shagari won the presidential election because he had North in his bag and also gathered meaningful votes from all other regions of Nigeria. Shagari also had spread all across the regions at that time. Atiku will do the same… North will massively vote for Atiku Abubakar. Naka Sai Naka!”

My observations are:

  1. Kwankwaso/NNPP is not Aminu Kano/PRP. NNPP lacks PRP’s leftist ideology, lacks PRP’s long NEPU history dating back to 1949, lacks PRP’s spread into the old NEPU strongholds and, while Kwankwaso is charismatic and dynamic, he nowhere measures up to Aminu Kano in towering political personality.
  2. Peter Obi/LP is not Azikiwe/NPP. Obi is the biggest political discovery of this election cycle, has made big impact on the social media and might sweep South East states. However, LP is not the South East Establishment that NPP was. Obi has nothing like Zik’s overwhelming national and Africa-wide charisma, Zik’s decades-long political staying power, his unrivalled education, intellect and dazzling eloquence. Besides, NPP went beyond South East and won old Plateau State. Doesn’t look like LP can do the same.
  3. Atiku/PDP of 2023 is not Shagari/NPN of 1979. Sure, at one point PDP had more national spread than NPN, but it is now reduced to control of 14 states, 5 of them in rebellion, one more governor wavering, which NPN never experienced. NPN’s strongholds were North and southern minority states, while PDP’s strongholds since 2015 were South East and Niger Delta states, both of them now shaky. Atiku is more dynamic, more resolute and a more vigorous campaigner than Shagari, but Shagari recorded electoral success as an instantly sellable compromise candidate who had almost no personal enemies in Nigerian politics.
  4. Tinubu/APC is a world different from Awo/UPN. The only historical connection is that Tinubu was probably an Awoist in 1979 and the AD/AC/ACN structure he subsequently built and led was an offshoot of AG/UPN. Yet, Tinubu achieved what Awo/UPN never did, i.e. integrated the West, once synonymous with opposition politics, into a truly national party that captured power at the federal level while retaining hold on the region. Awo could not even find a Northern running mate in 1979 and he settled for an Igbo man. Tinubu on the other hand is now supported by the Northern Political Establishment and most of the region’s governors. Awo never visited Northern Emirs during his helicopter-bound campaigns. But Tinubu receives the warmest receptions in emir’s palaces. [The emirs have no choice because most of the governors are on his side].

So all the Naka Sai Naka analogies are fraudulent.

A hush, pro-PDP Naka Sai Naka campaign is historically fraudulent because it was PDP that brought Chief Olusegun Obasanjo in 1999 and convinced Northerners that he was a tried and tested friend of the region.

Two can play the same game. It is now APC’s turn to bring Tinubu and say he is a tested friend of the region.

Naka Sai Naka is not true. It is also dangerous. What happens to Nigeria if every region says Naka Sai Naka?

Mahmud Jega is a respected Nigerian columnist

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started